The Subaru Crosstrek helped jumpstart the subcompact SUV segment. Since then, it’s fended off many competitors, one of which is the Mazda CX-30, a relatively new competitor. Which one should earn a spot in your garage? Should you go rugged and practical, or refined and premium? We’ll help you decide, so let’s get to it
Subaru Crosstrek vs Mazda CX-30: Two Ends of the Style Spectrum
The Crosstrek and CX-30 live on opposite ends of the styling spectrum. Upright and traditional, the Subaru looks like a lifted Impreza with plenty of body cladding…which is what it is. Meanwhile, the CX-30 goes all in on sensuous, flowing lines just like its hatchback sibling, the Mazda3. Only this time, the CX-30 tones down the coupe-like roofline and adds body cladding for a more rugged look.
It’s the same story inside. The Subaru Crosstrek features a spacious cabin that comfortably accommodates four passengers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 has tight rear seats best saved for use in a pinch. Meanwhile, the Crosstrek doubles down on versatility with a usable cargo area with the rear seats up or down. The CX-30? Not as useful thanks to its shape. You’ll need to fold the back seats to get some usable space because of the lack of vertical space. Neither one is the roomiest in the subcompact SUV segment, but the Crosstrek wins out in usability because of its more conventional shape. At least both have reasonable storage for smartphones and small items.
Where the Mazda CX-30 edges out the Subaru Crosstrek is in fit and finish. That’s where the CX-30 has an edge. Its build quality feels a class above, adding to its premium feel. Its quiet cabin also adds to that, especially on the highway. On the other hand, the Crosstrek feels more utilitarian. Its materials feel sturdy, but more mainstream. At highway speeds, you get a little more wind noise versus the CX-30.
Touchscreen Versus Knob
Neither the Crosstrek nor the CX-30 has the most modern infotainment system, but one is easier to use than the other. The Crosstrek goes traditional with an 11.6-inch touchscreen (or two 7-inch displays on the base model) that has easy controls and plenty of shortcuts. Although it has several submenus, it remains sensible and relatively intuitive thanks to its quick responses.
Meanwhile, the CX-30 has either an 8.8-inch or 10.25-inch display, the latter of which can be controlled through touch with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Otherwise, you must use the knob and buttons behind the shifter, which can feel cumbersome and distracting because of its learn curve. Additionally, Mazda’s setup has several submenus, meaning it takes a while to get to what you’re looking for. At least it’s responsive and has cleaner graphics than the Subaru’s setup.
As for the listening experience, the Mazda wins hands down. The available 12-speaker Bose premium audio system is immersive and clearer than the Crosstrek’s available 10-speaker Harman Kardon equivalent. That’s not to say it’s bad because it’s far from it. The CX-30’s optional system is just better.
Driver Assistance Tech Comes Standard
Both the Crosstrek and CX-30 come standard with a full suite of driver assistance technologies. However, Subaru’s EyeSight system works more seamlessly. It’s less intrusive than Mazda’s i-ActivSense equivalent and works to help you out. Although it can feel like a nanny at times, EyeSight remains the least intrusive of the two.
The CX-30’s setup feels less crude in certain scenarios. In some cases, it reacts too late. The lane keeping, for instance, won’t bring you back into your lane until you’re halfway through crossing into the other lane. When it does react, it jerks you over, resulting in the driver assistance suite feeling less refined. In the Subaru Crosstrek, EyeSight doesn’t do that. It makes subtle steering inputs before your wheels even touch the lane lines.
Subaru Crosstrek vs Mazda CX-30: Comfortable Versus Sporty
Looking for a subcompact SUV that drives well? The CX-30 has your name all over it. Despite having a torsion beam rear suspension, it’s quite possibly the best handling entry in its class. Great body control, communicative steering, and a willing chassis make the CX-30 an engaging drive. Thanks to the added suspension travel and softer calibration over its sibling, the Mazda3, the CX-30 manages to ride well. It does a great job handling road imperfections while retaining its taut, agile personality.
Meanwhile, the Crosstrek focuses more on daily usability. As a result, it offers a supple ride, allowing it to glide over road imperfections, potholes, and expansion joints. An independent suspension setup in all four corners aids with this, all while keeping the car planted through turns. While not as athletic as the CX-30, the Subaru Crosstrek is far from sloppy. However, its steering lacks the feel and communication that the Mazda has.
The tradeoff? Better off-road capability. With over 9.0 inches of ground clearance on the Wilderness and 8.7 inches on the others, the Crosstrek feels at home on a dirt road as it does on pavement. The softer suspension tune does wonders, allowing the car to stay comfortable through the rough stuff. Most importantly, it doesn’t come at the cost of on-road driving dynamics, turning the Crosstrek into a great all-around subcompact SUV.
Compelling Powertrain Lineup
Subaru and Mazda offer solid powertrain options. The Crosstrek now comes standard with a 2.5-liter flat-four with 180 hp and 178 lb-ft of torque. That comes exclusively with a CVT. You can also choose a 194-hp hybrid on the Sport and Limited trims. On the road, the standard naturally aspirated engine offers good grunt for daily driving, and the CVT responds quickly.
Although the power is useful, the Crosstrek is more at home cruising casually instead of getting pushed to the limit. Go for the hybrid if you’re looking for more punch. The electric motor on that powertrain makes 118 hp and a healthy 199 lb-ft of torque on its own. While we’ve yet to sample a Crosstrek Hybrid, we expect that car to offer a smoother drive with the added electrified torque.
Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 has a 2.5-liter four-cylinder in either naturally aspirated or turbocharged flavors. Both come exclusively with a six-speed automatic transmission. The base engine makes up 191 hp and 186 lb-ft of torque, depending on the model year. Like the Crosstrek’s equivalent, it offers good power for daily use. However, Mazda’s six-speed responds more willingly and quickly downshifts to a lower gear when necessary.
Looking for more power? The CX-30 Turbo has up to 250 hp and 320 lb-ft of torque. This mill serves plenty of low-end grunt, resulting in effortless power. The tradeoff? Fuel efficiency. The CX-30 Turbo has an EPA-estimated rating of 22/30/25 mpg city/highway/combined. That’s 2 to 4 mpg lower than the non-turbo version and the base Crosstrek. Versus the latter’s optional hybrid powertrain? Make that 11 mpg lower. Add the CX-30’s small 12.7-gallon fuel tank, and that means you’ll be stopping for fuel more often.
Versatile Daily or Sporty Lifted Hatch?
The Subaru Crosstrek consistently sells over 100,000 units because of its blend of versatility, efficiency, comfort, and ruggedness. It’s a winning combo that’s made it the subcompact SUV standard since it first arrived in 2010. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 doubles down on refinement, premium appointments, and a sporty drive, all brand hallmarks. Both stand out in unique ways, but the one that wins a spot in your driveway is the car that best checks all of your boxes. Both of these vehicles remain strong choices, and you can’t go wrong with either one.
